I think that next year, I'll try to create pod casts for the most complex lessons so that students who are absent, or students who don't quite get it the first time can listen to it as many times as they'd like. Perhaps this will save me time, and allow students to get the material whether they are present or not.
With that, I created my first podcast for the lesson I plan to teach tomorrow: "What is nuclear fission and nuclear fusion?" In it, I address the learning standards that students will "explain the difference between fusion and fission, based on the energy changes" (P8C3, P8C4), and they will also "explain that in nuclear reactions, massive amounts of energy in the form of heat is generated." (P8C3, P8C4)
http://podcastmachine.com/podcasts/13354/episodes/68338
Below is the transcript for the following podcast:
What is the
difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion?
The topic we will be addressing in today’s podcast will
address the main differences between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. You might be wondering to yourself, aren’t
they the same thing? If not, what is the
difference and why are they important?
Nuclear energy refers to the energy that is stored inside
the nucleus of an atom. This energy can only
be released during the processes of nuclear fission or nuclear fusion. Both types of reactions release energy that
can be converted into usable forms like light, heat and electricity. Both can be used in nuclear weapons, but
that’s about where their similarities end.
Nuclear fission is
when a massive atom splits into two or more smaller atoms. This process does not occur naturally, but we
humans have seemed to make it happen. In
1934, physicist Enrico Fermi proved that atoms could be split through fission,
and that some of the sub-atomic particles released as the atoms broke apart
turned into energy. This proved Albert
Einstein’s theory that a particle traveling at the speed of light actually did
equal pure energy. You might know this
concept better as the formula E=mc². Later,
as tensions around the world escalated around the 1940’s and 1950’s, scientists
took the technology of fission further to develop nuclear weapons.
In fission, the nucleus of an atom is struck by a colliding
proton or neutron, and the nucleus breaks apart into smaller pieces. These highly radioactive pieces go flying off
in every direction, striking other nuclei, thus creating a chain reaction. The entire process occurs quite quickly,
lasting only a fraction of a second. Now,
not every atom will split when it is hit with a colliding sub-atomic particle
though. In order for an element to
undergo fission, the atom’s nucleus must be larger
than the element iron. The reason for
this is that elements smaller than iron are generally more stable, and are
unlikely to split apart when hit, if they are even hit in the first place. But I digress. If the reactions are not controlled, and are
left to split as quickly as they can, an atomic bomb has been created. When the reactions are carefully controlled, however,
they can be used to safely generate electricity that powers entire cities.
In a nuclear power plant, fission of Uranium-235 isotopes is
regulated by control rods that prevent the reactions from going out of
control. The number of reactions
determines the amount of heat energy that is produced, and without them, the
plant might suffer a nuclear meltdown. The
heat energy that is produced through the process of nuclear fission is then
used to boil water in the core of a reactor that eventually spins a turbine, thus
generating usable electricity.
For atoms that are smaller
than the element iron (those that will not split), they might undergo the
process of nuclear fusion. This is the process of fusing two or more
nuclei together to form a larger atom. Fusion
requires atoms that are smaller than the element iron, because any element
bigger than iron would become too large and therefore too unstable to stick
together once the nuclei collided.
As the nuclei of atom
fuses together, an ENORMOUS amount of energy is released. The amount of energy released is actually
3-4 times greater than that released during fission. Because of this, scientists have been working
for over 60 years to try and control nuclear fusion with the goal of generating
usable electricity. Unfortunately, they
have not yet found a way to create self-sustaining nuclear fusion here on
Earth. What they have managed to do,
however, is to perfect the Hydrogen bomb.
In an H-bomb, two hydrogen isotopes fuse together, releasing 17.6
Megaelectron Volts of energy. While this
in itself is not a ton, the process altogether is promising because it
generates 10 times the amount of energy actually needed to start the
reaction. The reason why so much energy
is needed to start it is because the nucleus of an atom has a positive
charge. When it gets close to another nucleus,
they repel. You need a lot of heat and a
lot of speed to make these particles collide and stick, but the reward is worth
it. In nature, nuclear fusion is the
power behind our sun and other stars.
Inside them, hydrogen atoms fuse together to create helium and other
heavier elements, which burn brightly, emitting energy in the form of
electromagnetic waves that we can use here on Earth. Finally, the process of fusion creates less
radioactive waste than nuclear fission does, making it a potentially safer
energy source in the long run.
Well, that’s it for today’s lesson on the differences
between fission and fusion. Hopefully
you’ve learned a lot, but here are the most important things you should
remember:
- Fission is the breaking down of a large atom, while fusion is the joining of two or more smaller ones.
- Fission does not occur naturally, while fusion is what powers the sun and other stars.
- Both are in nuclear weapons, but fusion produces 3-4 times as much power as fission.
Until next time, this is Mrs. Hallman saying good night, and
happy learning!
I agree with your idea of creating a podcast. I have thought about using Dragon Naturally Speaking. This software allows you to record as you speak and it also types as you record. This works for both audio and visual learners by showing the transcript of the presentation as well as allowing audio learners to listen to it later. It is only supposed to be about $100 for educators, and I am really considering asking for it next year. It might not be a bad idea to look into something like that. Good luck with fission and fusion. It seems confusing! :)
ReplyDeleteI love the idea of helping absent students stay on top of make up work. Word will transcribe your speaking. However, you have to "train" your computer, so the accuracy could be a challenge.
ReplyDeleteYour podcast was great. If you continue, your kids would benefit greatly.
You'll have to tell me how to use Word for that! I've heard of Dragon Speak like Jenn suggested, but it's quite pricey. If I could use a program I already have, that'd be amazing! :-) Thanks for the tip!
Delete